Comments on: The RSS model http://blog-o-blog.com/09/01/2008/the-rss-model/ is muffin but trouble Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:12:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media » Wednesday squibs http://blog-o-blog.com/09/01/2008/the-rss-model/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media » Wednesday squibs Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:51:57 +0000 http://blog-o-blog.com/09/01/2008/the-rss-model/#comment-296 [...] Say it: The RSS model. Zac Echola looks at the debate over partial vs. full RSS feeds and finds it similar to the debate over putting print content online. [...] [...] Say it: The RSS model. Zac Echola looks at the debate over partial vs. full RSS feeds and finds it similar to the debate over putting print content online. [...]

]]> By: hilker http://blog-o-blog.com/09/01/2008/the-rss-model/comment-page-1/#comment-295 hilker Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:54:28 +0000 http://blog-o-blog.com/09/01/2008/the-rss-model/#comment-295 i love the "the market isn’t prepared to advertise via RSS" argument, especially coming from leaders in two industries made to innovate: marketing & technology. the stubborn refusal is appalling. to your point about increasing page views, i would add that rss subscribers, on average, are a more valuable readership because they want to continue receiving your content, albeit remotely, as opposed to simply landing from a site like digg & immediately bouncing. i love the “the market isn’t prepared to advertise via RSS” argument, especially coming from leaders in two industries made to innovate: marketing & technology. the stubborn refusal is appalling.

to your point about increasing page views, i would add that rss subscribers, on average, are a more valuable readership because they want to continue receiving your content, albeit remotely, as opposed to simply landing from a site like digg & immediately bouncing.

]]>