« Previous | Next »
Say it: Las Vegas Sun headed in the right direction
Published on 11/01/08
by Zac Echola
The Las Vegas Sun recently launched a new Web site and I have a few criticisms. Overall, I think every paper in the country should find a way to emulate what the Sun is doing in terms of markup and general site design. I question a few other tactics.
The Good
Light use of photos and graphics makes the main graphics pop out and the page load extremely fast. Kudos.
The Sun has the most elegant markup I’ve seen on any current newspaper Web sites. With no inline styles, the table-less design will make re-skinning the site a snap down the road, should they feel the need to update. Separating content from format will save them months.
Item’s that need to be presented big are presented big, rather than simply on top. I love that the editorial picks share space above the fold with the constantly updated blogs that feed news throughout the day.
The Hi Def video looks beautiful. It’s well presented on both the homepage and the multimedia page. That you may download many videos in popular formats or embed them in your site is a step in the right direction.
The search! Simple yet powerful date span search aids in honing down keywords. Keywords are great for Google searches but news searchers generally seek specific items.
Human-readable URLs!
iCal exportable calendar!
The Bad
No ads? I love it, personally. But what a horrible business model! As of now, there seems to be no monetization strategy. That’s really bad news if you’re pushing video, let alone Hi Def video. Obviously an ad strategy will come, though I wonder how they came to the decision to roll out new site before building in ads. Seems silly to lose the revenue for no apparently good reason.
Feeds only exist for main sections, blogs and general comments throughout the site. But doesn’t some of that content overlap? I think we, as an industry, should be moving toward ever more granular feeds. As far as I can tell there aren’t any tags on news items. I’d like to subscribe to news, calendar events and blogs that only mention, say, McCarran airport.
The feeds are also partial text. Yuck.
Commenting requires registration. While a lot of anonymous comments amount to crap that must be moderated, a lot of good discussion comes from anonymous comments, too. I think the trade-off is worth it.
The Hi Def video sets you apart as far as a craft news goes, but what about commodity news? What about constantly feeding your site with brief video updates? Maybe the bloggers eventually do that, but I don’t see a site surviving on well produced Hi Def video alone. Not yet. Though, I really don’t know the Las Vegas broadband market well enough to comment. I do think the current strategy, while beautifully executed, feels old media. It lacks serious disruption against other competitors in the video arena.
The site, as of now, relies heavily on story-centric items. I’d like to see a solid push for database items. (For a start: There’s a LOT of money in Vegas, where is it all going?)
Update: Yoni Greenbaum just emailed this to me:
It looks like the lack of ads is the results of the JOA which has Las Vegas Review-Journal handling the advertising, circulation, production and marketing functions of the Sun, but having no involvement in the Sun’s website. In addition, the terms of the JOA “guarantees a second newspaper voice in the community”, so maybe online revenue is not a concern.
The end. Or is it?
Please leave a comment so I know what you think about this post. After that, check out It's randomonium! Or, if you're so inclined, take a gander at what I'm reading and my del.icio.us links.
Trackback URL: Las Vegas Sun headed in the right direction.
Tags: , , content is separate from form, do the right thing, how to internet
Comments on Las Vegas Sun headed in the right direction
2 Responses
Megan Taylor
12/01/08
We recently had to require registration for comments on http://www.alligator.org. Last semester we tried to get by with a filtering system, but since the editorial staff are all students, it was impossible to have someone moderating the comments throughout the day, as well as legally dangerous. We had an incident where commenters revealed the name of a sexual assault victim.
But our registration only requires a username, password and e-mail address. I know this won’t put a stop to all the nastiness, but my hope is that the extra 30 seconds and the lack of total anonymity will prevent further problems.
Zac Echola
12/01/08
What other people post on your site has little to no legal ramifications for a company or person (like a blogger) providing the forum for speech. This is an issue fairly well hashed out by the courts now.
I do see the problems that can arise from free-for-alls, but they’re something that can be handled by giving the community tools to self-police and adding editorial enforcement on a case-by-case scenario.
Requiring registration doesn’t mean you’ll keep the riff raff out, just a large percentage of users that don’t want to register.
That said, there are plenty of other tools out there we should look at, like OpenID, etc.
Leave a Comment
You can comment for 30ish days, then the thread closes. Them's the breaks. If this is your first time around, the comment gets held for moderation. Afterwards, post as you wish, friend. Some HTML is OK.